General Principles of Energy Management

Smith, Craig B.; Parmenter, Kelly E.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802506-2.00003-3

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Radovanovic (Golusin), S. Popov, S. Dodic [1], G. Smith, K. Parmenter [2], F. Sioshanci [3,4], G. Kayakutu, E. Mercier-Laurent [5], N. Hnydiuk [6], I. Hrytsiak [7], M. Makarenko, L. Khomutenko [8], I. Yakoviuk [9], I. Kosse [10], O. Shatylo [11], O. Pashechko [12]. At the same time, the resolution of the problems of harmonization of the energy legislation of Ukraine with the standards of the European Union and the definition of the basis on which basis the formation of an energy-efficient model of economic development of the country requires an analysis of the existing regulatory framework and its effectiveness in further introducing market relations in this area.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives and Problems of Harmonizing Energy Legislation of Ukraine with the European Union Standards

Volodymyrivna

Adamivna

2017

Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYEssence, features and components of the energy market was investigated in the article. Regulatory support of energy efficiency and energy saving in the European Union and Ukraine was analyzed. Ukraine obligations due to the harmonization of the energy legislation with the EU standards were defined. Problems in the housing and communal services (HCS) as one of the largest consumers of energy resources were revealed.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives and Problems of Harmonizing Energy Legislation of Ukraine with the European Union Standards

Volodymyrivna

Adamivna

2017

Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Governing energy in organisations: Energy management professionals, marginalised practices, and the limits to change

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organisations and institutions of many kinds play important roles in maintaining and transforming energy systems, not least through their direct contributions to energy demand. Major service‐providing institutions such as universities and hospitals have especially large and complex demands. Facing pressures to reduce environmental impacts and costs, many of these organisations are trying to reduce their energy consumption—with varying degrees of success. The responsibility for pursuing this goal in practice often lies with practitioners here referred to as Energy Management Professionals (EMPs). However, there has been little systematic investigation of EMPs' practices and their energy implications. Using qualitative evidence from English universities and hospitals, we argue that three types of work are marginalised in EMPs' practices, namely: (a) change‐focused work, and within that; (b) work engaging with people and what they do, and within that; (c) work engaging with institutional policy‐making. We argue that these marginalisations limit the scale and scope of demand reduction efforts, and also show how they arise from interacting dynamics of national policies and priorities, institutional structures and professional practices, and the influence of neoliberal governance, among other things. Finally, we discuss how rethinking institutional energy governance could help reduce energy demand and reflect on wider lessons for research and policy on organisational sustainability.

show abstract