2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General relationship between strength and hardness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
288
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 932 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
20
288
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[14]. Typically, strength is directly proportional to hardness, thus the high hardness value obtained implies the possible high strength of the HEA film [31]. This enhanced hardness is mainly ascribed to the shearing mechanism of dislocated particles or by-pass mechanism (Orowan-type), which induces the hardening produced by the precipitates observed in Figures 2 and 4 [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[14]. Typically, strength is directly proportional to hardness, thus the high hardness value obtained implies the possible high strength of the HEA film [31]. This enhanced hardness is mainly ascribed to the shearing mechanism of dislocated particles or by-pass mechanism (Orowan-type), which induces the hardening produced by the precipitates observed in Figures 2 and 4 [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to the theory of contact mechanics [22], the compression of spherical particle is similar to an inverse indentation, and thus the H c of the haze particles can be seen roughly as their hardness. For comparison, Vickers hardness of frequently used metals and alloys in industry, such as steels in bearings, superalloys in aircraft, have been shown in Figure 5(a) (red color) [12,[23][24][25][26][27]. It is obvious that the H c of iron-rich and fly ash particles are larger or at least comparable to the hardness of frequently used metals or alloys in industry ( Figure 5(a), red color).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, there is also strong experimental evidence corroborating the linear relationship between microhardness and yield strength in 1000 series aluminum [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Some data show a deviation in the linear relationship between σ y and Hv in the softened state, but assume a y-intercept of zero, which is not necessarily consistent with experimental results, where y-intercepts of N 100 have been reported [28,29]. Therefore, it can generally be assumed that yield strength and microhardness measurements are proportional such that…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 90%