2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General scheduling non-approximability results in presence of hierarchical communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the dual objective in this case is at least 2 times the algorithm's cost (here we without loss of generality assume that ≤ 1/8, and we can remove this assumption easily by scaling ). Now we will show that we can divide all the dual variables by 20 2 to obtain a feasible solution to the dual. This will give an O(1/ 3 ) competitive algorithm.…”
Section: Identical Endpoints On Broomsticksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the dual objective in this case is at least 2 times the algorithm's cost (here we without loss of generality assume that ≤ 1/8, and we can remove this assumption easily by scaling ). Now we will show that we can divide all the dual variables by 20 2 to obtain a feasible solution to the dual. This will give an O(1/ 3 ) competitive algorithm.…”
Section: Identical Endpoints On Broomsticksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing these scheduling issues is not new. Besides a large amount of work being done in practical scheduling literature, there has been some theoretical work done offline with the goal of minimizing makespan [8,9,16,17,20,21]. Additionally, over two decades ago Phillps, Stein and Wein [32] introduced an interesting model of network scheduling and argued its importance in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%