2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General solution for shear strength estimate of RC elements based on panel response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Wood [15], Sanchez-Alejandre and Alcocer [16], and Gluec & Whittaker [17] suggested empirical expressions. On the contrary, Hsu & Mo [18], Massone & Melo [19], and Chandra et al [12] developed softened truss models. Hwang & Lee [20,21], Kassem [14], Ma et al [22], and Chetchotisak et al [23] presented strut and tie models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Wood [15], Sanchez-Alejandre and Alcocer [16], and Gluec & Whittaker [17] suggested empirical expressions. On the contrary, Hsu & Mo [18], Massone & Melo [19], and Chandra et al [12] developed softened truss models. Hwang & Lee [20,21], Kassem [14], Ma et al [22], and Chetchotisak et al [23] presented strut and tie models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to experimental observations, several analysis models have been established to investigate the shear capacity of RC members. These models consists of theoretical and empirical types [28]. Vecchio and Collins [29] suggested a shear design procedure using an improved compressed field method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%