1979
DOI: 10.1016/0047-259x(79)90054-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General theorems on “Little-o” rates of closeness of two weighted sums of independent Hilbert space valued random variables with applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As faras the authors are aware, there are no comparable general limit ,theorems with rates in the literature. • The type of convergence considered in this paper is more general than that in BUTZER, HAHN and ROECRERATH [10], or in BUTZER and SCHULZ [13] where the dependency structure is of type of martingale difference sequences. In fact; the convergence considered in (1.1) is that for the difference f /(x + u) dFT,,(x) -f /(x ± u) dFz(x)…”
Section: Il€irmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As faras the authors are aware, there are no comparable general limit ,theorems with rates in the literature. • The type of convergence considered in this paper is more general than that in BUTZER, HAHN and ROECRERATH [10], or in BUTZER and SCHULZ [13] where the dependency structure is of type of martingale difference sequences. In fact; the convergence considered in (1.1) is that for the difference f /(x + u) dFT,,(x) -f /(x ± u) dFz(x)…”
Section: Il€irmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The latter. were generalized to the case of not necessarily independent random variables which form martingale difference sequences or al-rays in ' BuJTZER, HAHN and ROECKERATH [10,11], and to more general types of dependent random variables in BUTZER and ScHuLz [13][14][15], 'as well as to arbitrary sequences for the particular case of identically distributed random variables in BUTZER and KmscIEFINK [12]. As faras the authors are aware, there are no comparable general limit ,theorems with rates in the literature.…”
Section: Il€irmentioning
confidence: 99%