2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2930567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Theory of Skyhook Control and its Application to Semi-Active Suspension Control Strategy Design

Abstract: A novel general theory of skyhook control is proposed and applied to the semi-active suspension control strategy design to improve the performance of the vehicle suspension system. Based on this theory, the mechanical impedance model of the general theory of skyhook suspension is established. To design the suspension structure, the effect of the skyhook element and its parameters on suspension is analyzed. Then, adaptive fish swarm algorithm based on nonlinear dynamic visual field is used to optimize the param… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In recent years, based on the ''skyhook damper'' scheme, novel semiactive suspension control strategies and structures have been proposed. [7][8][9][10] Most modern vehicle control systems employ a feedback control structure. Therefore, the real-time estimation of the vehicle's dynamic states is required to enhance the performance of the vehicle's control system.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In recent years, based on the ''skyhook damper'' scheme, novel semiactive suspension control strategies and structures have been proposed. [7][8][9][10] Most modern vehicle control systems employ a feedback control structure. Therefore, the real-time estimation of the vehicle's dynamic states is required to enhance the performance of the vehicle's control system.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the traditional passive suspension, the passive ISD suspension and the controllable ISD suspension as objects, the three performance indexes of the body acceleration, suspension working space and dynamic tire load at speeds of 10 m/s, 20 m/s and 30 m/s are compared and studied, and the comparison of their RMS values is shown in Table 4. The simulations at the speed of 20 m/s are carried out under random road input conditions [33], as shown in Figure 8. It can be seen from Table 4 and Figure 8 that under the conditions of a random road input and when the vehicle speeds are 10 m/s, 20 m/s and 30 m/s, compared with the traditional passive suspension, the RMS value of body acceleration of the controllable ISD suspension has been decreased by 26.7% at most and the RMS value of suspension working space of the controllable ISD suspension has been decreased by 3.8% at most.…”
Section: Simulation Of Random Road Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. The kinetic equations of this model are as follows: The control strategy and suspension model are selected the GSH (General Skyhook) control suspension [32]. It contains the skyhook damper control [33][34] section and the skyhook inerter control [35] section.…”
Section: Suspension With Calibrated Nonlinear Inerter a Quarter-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suspension parameters are shown in Table II. The integral white noise in time-domain is selected as the road input x r , the input equation is: (32) where G 0 is the road roughness coefficient and it is set as 5×10 -6 m 3 /cycle, u is the vehicle speed and u = 20 m/s, w(t) is a mean value of zero Gauss white noise.…”
Section: Suspension With Calibrated Nonlinear Inerter a Quarter-mentioning
confidence: 99%