We systematically explore the exquisiteness of Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer(BCS) Hamiltonian where the BCS-type electron-phonon interaction is unambiguously reinforced as the only viable superglue in cuprate superconductors because phonon-induced scattering is effectively nil for Cooper pairs (in its original form), and also phonons are never required to Bose-condense. Here, we prove that (i) the Cooper-pair binding energy can be strengthened to obtain high superconductor transition temperature (T sc ) and (ii) the existence of a generalized electron-phonon potential operator that can induce the finite-temperature quantum phase transition between superconducting and strange metallic phases. To lend support for this extended BCS Hamiltonian, we derive the Fermi-Dirac statistics for Cooper-pair electrons, which correctly captures the physics of strongly bounded Cooper-pair break up with respect to changing temperature or superconductor gap (∆ BCS ). Finally, we further extend the BCS Hamiltonian within the ionization energy theory formalism to prove (iii) the existence of optimal doping that has maximum T sc (x optimum ) or ∆ BCS (x optimum ), and (iv) that the specific heat capacity jump at T sc in cuprates is due to finite-temperature quantum phase transition. Along the way, we expose the precise microscopic reason why predicting (not guessing) a superconductor properly is a hard problem within any theory that require pairing mechanism.On the basis of general consensus (somewhat similar to the enforced Copenhagen interpretation), two alternative proposals have been 'elected' because they are supported by certain experiments, and only one of them is believed to hold the key ingredients for high T BM sc superconductivity [7]. Briefly, the elected proposals are-(i) the magnetic spin fluctuation induced superglue [8] and (ii) the Anderson resonating valence bond theory that require Bose-Einstein condensation of holon pairs and spin-liquid [9-12]. For some in-depth arguments in favor of these proposals, refer to the reviews written by Baskaran [11] and Scalapino [13].Here, we do not follow any of these alternatives for two theoretically solid reasons-the first has been exposed earlier (see the first paragraph), while the second reason shall be