2018
DOI: 10.17105/spr-2017-0044.v47-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizability of Universal Screening Measures for Behavioral and Emotional Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such findings have been a potential cause for concern among researchers and practitioners. Though it would be hoped that any variance in screening scores is attributable to real behavioral differences among students, it would seem that teachers are, in fact, contributing something unique to the ratings (Tanner et al, 2018). Recent research suggests a portion of this variance can be attributed to certain teacher-level factors, such as teacher gender (Splett et al, This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such findings have been a potential cause for concern among researchers and practitioners. Though it would be hoped that any variance in screening scores is attributable to real behavioral differences among students, it would seem that teachers are, in fact, contributing something unique to the ratings (Tanner et al, 2018). Recent research suggests a portion of this variance can be attributed to certain teacher-level factors, such as teacher gender (Splett et al, This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A follow up to this study helped to partially resolve this issue. Specifically, Tanner, Eklund, Kilgus, and Johnson (2018) used generalizability theory analyses to identify the percentage of variance in screening scores that was attributable to teacher raters. Multiple teacher raters were recruited from each classroom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several limitations in the present study that need to be addressed. First, research has indicated that teachers can attribute large amounts of variance in universal screening for SEB risk (Tanner et al, 2018). A multilevel model would control for the nested structure of responding; however, teacher and school information were unavailable.…”
Section: Limitations and Constraints On Generalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support for the multi‐informant approach includes the possible utility of the additional data gleaned by having a proxy reporter (Dirks et al, 2012; Johnston & Murray, 2003). Although the study of incremental validity available via a multi‐informant assessment approach is relatively underdeveloped (De Los Reyes et al, 2015), a recent study noted improved generalizability and accuracy of universal screening scores when using two raters (Tanner et al, 2018). As parents can see their child across long periods and in various situations, they might provide useful information regarding their child's psychological functioning (McConaughy, 1993).…”
Section: Multi‐informant Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%