2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41664-018-0074-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalization of Reference System for Calculating the Second Dimension Retention Index in GC × GC–MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the excellent instrumental capability, the identification accuracy of current mass spectrum matching method is only about 79.6% [31][32][33] . Therefore, additional information such as retention index must be used to reduce the rate of false identifications 34,35 . On average, retention index matching removed about 8.9% of false identifications generated by mass spectrum matching (Table 1).…”
Section: Metabolite Coverage By Gc×gc-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the excellent instrumental capability, the identification accuracy of current mass spectrum matching method is only about 79.6% [31][32][33] . Therefore, additional information such as retention index must be used to reduce the rate of false identifications 34,35 . On average, retention index matching removed about 8.9% of false identifications generated by mass spectrum matching (Table 1).…”
Section: Metabolite Coverage By Gc×gc-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention times and total percentages offer important details regarding the makeup and characteristics of the substances under study. The retention time, which is a measure of how long a compound stays in a chromatographic column (Prodhan et al, 2018), varies from 14.1 to 19.68 minutes for each component. Due to the various chemical characteristics of each compound, there are variations in the way that each one interacts with the material in the column.…”
Section: Gas Chromatography-mass Spectrometry (Gc-ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,129,130 Therefore, additional information such as retention index must be used to reduce the rate of false identifications. 131,132 On average, retention index matching removed about 8.9% of false identifications generated by mass spectrum matching (Table 5.2). Overall, only about However, the percentage of assignment was dramatically reduced to only 1.1% to 1.8%…”
Section: Metabolite Coverage By Gc×gc-msmentioning
confidence: 99%