1983
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-83-05017-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizations of de Franchis theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the problem is reduced to the case where N is a smooth algebraic curve of hyperbolic type. Then Theorem 6 of [10] implies our assertion. Q.E.D.…”
Section: Proof Let ~: R Xn~f\d Be As In (45) It Is First Noted Thatsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore the problem is reduced to the case where N is a smooth algebraic curve of hyperbolic type. Then Theorem 6 of [10] implies our assertion. Q.E.D.…”
Section: Proof Let ~: R Xn~f\d Be As In (45) It Is First Noted Thatsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Loosely speaking, we show that, in general, the manifold X 1 × · · · × X n splits into two factors, one of which is the product of those non-compact factors to which the Remmert-Stein method can be applied. The finiteness result that is essential to our proof is a result by Imayoshi [4]. This result, plus some other technical necessities are stated in Section 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…De Franchis's theorem for Riemann surfaces of finite types and its generalization to the higher-dimensional case appears in [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface S 2 is defined by the equation u 2 = v(v 4 + av 2 + 1), while f (w, z) = (zw, z 2 ). By [20,21] for a = ± 10 3 we have Aut(S 2 ) = D 4 . For a = ± 10 3 we have | Aut(S 2 )| = 24.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%