2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Axial Stress-Strain Response of Rectangular Columns Confined Using CFRP Jackets and Anchors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in the figures, Equations (7) and (8) are able to predict with good accuracy (AAE = 7.5% and MSE = 12%) the f cc but show less accuracy (AAE = 24.0% and MSE = 20.0%) in predicting the corresponding strain ε cc . Significant variability in the confined strain values was also reported in numerous studies (e.g., Hany et al [52,53]). It can be generally observed from the comparisons provided in Figure 6a,b that the analytical values given by the proposed Equations (7) and (8) agree well with the test results compared with the model proposed by Yan [26].…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Proposed And Existing Strength And Strain Mosupporting
confidence: 54%
“…As reported in the figures, Equations (7) and (8) are able to predict with good accuracy (AAE = 7.5% and MSE = 12%) the f cc but show less accuracy (AAE = 24.0% and MSE = 20.0%) in predicting the corresponding strain ε cc . Significant variability in the confined strain values was also reported in numerous studies (e.g., Hany et al [52,53]). It can be generally observed from the comparisons provided in Figure 6a,b that the analytical values given by the proposed Equations (7) and (8) agree well with the test results compared with the model proposed by Yan [26].…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Proposed And Existing Strength And Strain Mosupporting
confidence: 54%