2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10217802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Beam Theory for Thin-Walled Beams with Curvilinear Open Cross-Sections

Abstract: The use of the Generalized Beam Theory (GBT) is extended to thin-walled beams with curvilinear cross-sections. After defining the kinematic features of the walls, where their curvature is consistently accounted for, the displacement of the points is assumed as linear combination of unknown amplitudes and pre-established trial functions. The latter, and specifically their in-plane components, are chosen as dynamic modes of a curved beam in the shape of the member cross-section. Moreover, the out-of-plane compon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Te shear force caused cross-sectional deformation, and therefore applying Bredt's formulas was needed for necessity. Latalski and Zulli [35] applied the generalized beam theory on a thinwalled beam whose out-of-plane components were derived from the proposition of Vlasov's internal constraint of shear in-deformable middle surface. Tey provided the crucial contribution in case of a change in cross section that happened at equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te shear force caused cross-sectional deformation, and therefore applying Bredt's formulas was needed for necessity. Latalski and Zulli [35] applied the generalized beam theory on a thinwalled beam whose out-of-plane components were derived from the proposition of Vlasov's internal constraint of shear in-deformable middle surface. Tey provided the crucial contribution in case of a change in cross section that happened at equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents a compelling instrument where, still dealing with one-dimensional continua, the local effects are apriori determined and described by assumed functions, amplified by parameters which are evaluated through equilibrium conditions. In this context, the choice of the assumed functions, as an outcome of the cross-section analysis, denotes a main step, as discussed in [10][11][12], where the use of free-dynamical modes of equivalent frames is proposed, and in case of curvilinear cross-sections [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%