2011
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2011.611882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized convex functions and generalized differentials

Abstract: We study some classes of generalized convex functions, using a generalized di¤erential approach. By this we mean a set-valued mapping which stands either for a derivative, a subdi¤erential or a pseudodi¤erential in the sense of Jeyakumar and Luc. We establish some links between the corresponding classes of pseudoconvex, quasiconvex and another class of generalized convex functions we introduced. We devise some optimality conditions for constrained optimization problems. In particular, we get Lagrange-KuhnTucke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since f is @f -pseudoconvex and f is @( f )-pseudoconvex, f and f are quasiconvex by [15,Proposition 6]. Thus, f is quasia¢ ne on C.…”
Section: Proposition 33 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since f is @f -pseudoconvex and f is @( f )-pseudoconvex, f and f are quasiconvex by [15,Proposition 6]. Thus, f is quasia¢ ne on C.…”
Section: Proposition 33 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. We assume that a set-valued map @f : C X is given which stands for a substitute to the derivative of f ; we call it a generalized di¤ erential of f . As observed in [15], the choice for @f is not limited to the subdi¤erentials of nonsmooth analysis; one can also take the convexi…cators of [7], the pseudo-di¤erentials of Jeyakumar and Luc ( [8]), and much more. We assume that @f (x) 6 = ?…”
Section: Notation and De…nitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations