2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized CPHD filter modeling spawning targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed that Eq. (15) describes a linear Gaussian model and the states can be estimated by the Kalman filter (KF). The nonlinear states can be estimated by utilizing the sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) method.…”
Section: A Description Of the Proposed Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be observed that Eq. (15) describes a linear Gaussian model and the states can be estimated by the Kalman filter (KF). The nonlinear states can be estimated by utilizing the sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) method.…”
Section: A Description Of the Proposed Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have carried out relevant research [10][11][12][13][14]. In [15], based on the famous Faà di Bruno determinant, a tractable recursion computation technique of the general cardinality prediction equation is presented. In [16], a robust CPHD based on interacting multiple model (RCPHD-IMM) is proposed for multiple maneuvering targets tracking under the Doppler blind zone of airborne pulse Doppler radar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another work deals with CPHD spawning [16] that cites and forms comparisons with an earlier version of the current article [17]. The most significant difference between presented results is that a conclusive analytical expression for the predicted cardinality distribution that includes arbitrary birth and spawning is not provided in [16], i.e., quantities remain requiring further derivation by the reader, whereas the current article presents conclusive, analytical and tractable expressions in Section III-B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another work deals with CPHD spawning [16] that cites and forms comparisons with an earlier version of the current article [17]. The most significant difference between presented results is that a conclusive analytical expression for the predicted cardinality distribution that includes arbitrary birth and spawning is not provided in [16], i.e., quantities remain requiring further derivation by the reader, whereas the current article presents conclusive, analytical and tractable expressions in Section III-B. Additionally, while derivations in this article include the application of Faà di Bruno's formula to probability generating functionals (p.g.fl.s) describing point processes, the approach in [16] is more comparable to that of the technical report [15] in that both apply the formula to probability generating functions (p.g.fs) describing probability mass functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many theoretical and algorithmic improvements for these algorithms are proposed in the literature. Such methods include: a GM-PHD filter with false alarm detection using an irregular window [25], a variable structure multiple model GMCPHD filter [26], multiple modal PHD filters for tracking maneuvering targets [27,28,29], joint underwater target detection and tracking using the Bernoulli filter [30] and a generalized CPHD filter with a model for spawning targets [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%