2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11590-018-1358-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized cut and metric polytopes of graphs and simplicial complexes

Abstract: Given a graph G one can define the cut polytope CUTP(G) and the metric polytope METP(G) of this graph and those polytopes encode in a nice way the metric on the graph. According to Seymour's theorem, CUTP(G) = METP(G) if and only if K 5 is not a minor of G.We consider possibly extensions of this framework: (1) We compute the CUTP(G) and METP(G) for many graphs.(2) We define the oriented cut polytope WOMCUTP(G) and oriented multicut polytope OMCUTP(G) as well as their oriented metric version QMETP(G) and WQMETP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. The desired result follows from (10) and since clearly I Cyc(M ) = 0 if and only if height I Cyc(M ) = 0, since it is a prime ideal. Proof.…”
Section: The Comparison Of the Highest Degrees Of Minimal Homogeneous...mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. The desired result follows from (10) and since clearly I Cyc(M ) = 0 if and only if height I Cyc(M ) = 0, since it is a prime ideal. Proof.…”
Section: The Comparison Of the Highest Degrees Of Minimal Homogeneous...mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For simplicity, let d(M) := the number of coparallel classes of M. As it was mentioned in Section 3, it is known that dim P Cyc (M) = d(M). This together with [4,Proposition 4.22] imply that the Krull dimension of the cycle algebra of M is given by dim K[Cyc(M)] = d(M) + 1, and hence (10) height…”
Section: The Comparison Of the Highest Degrees Of Minimal Homogeneous...mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For four settings on each side, the number of facet inequalities grows to 175, where 169 of these inequalities genuinely use the four settings. The list of 175 inequalities has been found in [3][4][5], however the realization that the list is complete is due to [6]. Therefore, one could find an almost complete list of the inequalities distributed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%