2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized cut operation associated with higher order variation in tensor models

Abstract: The cut and join operations play important roles in tensor models in general. We introduce a generalization of the cut operation associated with the higher order variations and demonstrate how they generate operators in the Aristotelian tensor model. We point out that, by successive choices of appropriate variations, the cut operation generalized this way can generate those operators which do not appear in the ring of the join operation, providing a tool to enumerate the operators by a level by level analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…q 3 = 1: q ′ ′ ⊢ k − 1, with k − 1 even so the induction hypothesis (2.24) applies to q ′′ , and so we write: Sym(q) = 3 Sym(q ′ ′ ) ⩽ 3 Sym[2 (k−1)/2 ] = 3 Sym[2 (k+2−3)/2 ] = Sym[3, 2 (k+2−3)/2 ] (A. 19) q 3 = 3: q ′ ′ ⊢ k + 2 − 3 * 3 = k − 7, with k − 7 even. Thus, the induction (2.24) applies to q ′′ : Sym(q) = 3 3 3!…”
Section: Appendix a Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…q 3 = 1: q ′ ′ ⊢ k − 1, with k − 1 even so the induction hypothesis (2.24) applies to q ′′ , and so we write: Sym(q) = 3 Sym(q ′ ′ ) ⩽ 3 Sym[2 (k−1)/2 ] = 3 Sym[2 (k+2−3)/2 ] = Sym[3, 2 (k+2−3)/2 ] (A. 19) q 3 = 3: q ′ ′ ⊢ k + 2 − 3 * 3 = k − 7, with k − 7 even. Thus, the induction (2.24) applies to q ′′ : Sym(q) = 3 3 3!…”
Section: Appendix a Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algebra has implications for the structure of tensor model correlators [6,16]. The algebraic perspectives on tensor model correlators have been developed in [17][18][19]. Similar techniques have been applied to orthogonal invariants [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where R 1 , R 2 , R 3 are Young diagrams or partition of n and τ i , i = 1, 2, range over Clebsch-Gordan multiplicities, also known as Kronecker coefficients (the explicit formula is given in [73] and developed in detail in [9]). Further investigations of tensor models from this algebraic perspective are in [25,4,7,34,33,31,53,55,54,2,24]. A known connection between bipartite ribbon graphs and Belyi maps [66,87] gives a topological version of gauge-string duality between tensor models and string theory [8], generalizing analogous correspondences between two-dimensional Yang Mills theory and topological string theory [44,21,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can easily foresee that the quantum field theory calculations heavily rely on the diagrammatics and combinatorics of these objects. Hence, a systematic combinatorial study of U(N) and O(N) classical invariants has been launched in the recent years bringing already a wealth of core results [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,7,17,18] A preferred way of enumerating these invariants mainly rests on algebraic techniques of the symmetric groups. There are a lot of reasons why the use symmetric groups has become a natural reflex and a dominating tool in the combinatorial study of tensor invariants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%