“…Recently, progress has been made in improving the accuracy of such methods through the use of a resolution of the identity, 28,29 optimized zero-point energy parameters, 30,31 the generalized master equation, 32 nonadiabatic ring-polymer molecular dynamics, 33 symmetric windowing (SQC), 34 spin-mapping, 35,36 and other alternative classical mapping models. [37][38][39][40] Some of these advancements have also already been used to obtain both linear and nonlinear optical spectra. 11,[41][42][43][44] A particularly successful method for computing dynamical observables within exciton systems is the standard partially linearized density matrix (PLDM) [45][46][47][48] approach, which uses coherent states within the MMST mapping space to describe the dynamics associated with the forward and backward exciton paths separately through the use of two independent sets of mapping variables.…”