1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01277981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Gamma convolutions and complete monotonicity

Abstract: Summary. Let

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We omit the proof of the fact that the inverted-beta distribution is a GGC, which is surprisingly involved; see Example 3.1 in Bondesson [1990]. The upshot of this result, however, is that the horseshoe prior can be represented as subordinated Brownian motion: the Lévy measure of the inverted-beta is concentrated on R + , and the corresponding independent-increments process therefore increases only by positive jumps.…”
Section: N Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We omit the proof of the fact that the inverted-beta distribution is a GGC, which is surprisingly involved; see Example 3.1 in Bondesson [1990]. The upshot of this result, however, is that the horseshoe prior can be represented as subordinated Brownian motion: the Lévy measure of the inverted-beta is concentrated on R + , and the corresponding independent-increments process therefore increases only by positive jumps.…”
Section: N Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We omit the proof of the fact that the inverted beta distribution is self‐decomposable; see example 3.1 in Bondesson (1990). The consequence of this fact is that the horseshoe prior can be represented directly as subordinated Brownian motion.…”
Section: Priors and Penalties From Lévy Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the density of a GGC, with K α,δ = √ 2δ/Γ(1 − α). Since δ ≤ 1/2 < 3/2, we see from Theorem 6.2 in [2] (and the Remark 6.1 thereafter) that this will be done as soon as…”
Section: Notationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…has CM derivative in w = v + 1/v for any fixed u, c > 0 (see [2], page 183), again Criterion 2 in [12], page 417, entails that the function ρ(uv)ρ(u/v) is CM in w, so that ρ is HCM.…”
Section: Related Hcm Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%