2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized HPC method for the Poisson equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study for the properties of 3D HPC methods is currently in progress as a further study. Moreover, the analysis regarding accuracy in Sections 2.2 and 3 can also be extended to the HPC‐based Poisson solver in Bardazzi et al, and calculations have already shown that the original solver can be further improved. This work will be included in a future publication.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study for the properties of 3D HPC methods is currently in progress as a further study. Moreover, the analysis regarding accuracy in Sections 2.2 and 3 can also be extended to the HPC‐based Poisson solver in Bardazzi et al, and calculations have already shown that the original solver can be further improved. This work will be included in a future publication.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remainder of the domain, where the Laplace equation applies, the more efficient HPC method could be used. Other studies that apply DD to couple different computational regions can be found in, eg, Colicchio and Greco Recently, Bardazzi et al generalized the original HPC method to solve the Poisson equation. In their paper, problems involving forcing terms with a strong singularity are solved successfully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with scalar-to-vector variable operator ς k T defined by (13) and adjoint boundary residual operator r˚, k BT defined by (19). Additionally, it holds…”
Section: Reformulation Of the Stabilization Bilinear Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classical methods have been used to numerically solve problem (1) or variations thereof in the context of computational electromagnetism. A (by far) non-exhaustive list includes, in particular, [13,14,15,16,4,17,18] and the high-order method of [19]. Such methods are limited to standard element shapes and, in most cases, do not support nonconforming mesh refinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of high-order polynomials and the resultant sparse coefficient matrix indicate that the HPC method is time efficient and of high accuracy. Subsequent work and improvements were conducted in recent years [27][28][29][30] to circumvent more challenging problems. In contrast to the boundary element method (BEM), which is widely applied in potential flow computation, the HPC method is more time efficient and the computational cost is roughly proportional to the number of unknowns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%