2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized inflow performance relationships for horizontal gas wells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining Equations ( 10) and ( 17), the two-phase flow productivity equation for horizontal well with stress 6 Lithosphere sensitivity and reservoir pressure change in unsaturated reservoirs can be established as follows:…”
Section: : ð12þmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining Equations ( 10) and ( 17), the two-phase flow productivity equation for horizontal well with stress 6 Lithosphere sensitivity and reservoir pressure change in unsaturated reservoirs can be established as follows:…”
Section: : ð12þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate evaluation of stress sensitivity and its influence on well productivity is of great significance to optimize the well working system in these kinds of reservoirs and thus can improve oil recovery and save production cost at the same time. As an ancient but important method, inflow performance analysis has been widely used for its simplicity and practicality to evaluate and predict well productivity in production and reservoir engineering [6][7][8][9], and it is also the main research method adopted in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method had a tedious process and did not consider reservoir anisotropy. Tabatabaei [13] first considered the three different boundary conditions of dynamic inflow analysis and prediction. He studied the internal qualitative relationship between transient-state pressure behaviors and inflow performance of the wells, but he did not establish any inflow performance evaluation model.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%