2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.93.022113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized interaction-free evolutions

Abstract: A thorough analysis of the evolutions of bipartite systems characterized by the 'effective absence' of interaction between the two subsystems is reported. First, the connection between the concepts underlying Interaction-Free Evolutions (IFE) and Decoherence-Free Subspaces (DFS) is explored, showing intricate relations between these concepts. Second, starting from this analysis and inspired by a generalization of DFS already known in the literature, we introduce the notion of generalized IFE (GIFE), also provi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We underline that, under the particular physical conditions in Equation ( 8), H b presents an effective decoupling of the fictitious two-level system b (which simulates the behaviour of the two actual spins within the subspace b) from the relative bosonic bath. This means that the subspace b is a decoherence-free subspace, or, in other words, that any initial state of the two-spin system belonging to such a subspace evolves as if the coupling between the two spins and the bath were absent [46][47][48]. The physical reason at the basis of this occurrence relies on the equal coupling of the two spins to the bath, i.e., c 1j = c 2j , ∀j.…”
Section: Exactly Solvable Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We underline that, under the particular physical conditions in Equation ( 8), H b presents an effective decoupling of the fictitious two-level system b (which simulates the behaviour of the two actual spins within the subspace b) from the relative bosonic bath. This means that the subspace b is a decoherence-free subspace, or, in other words, that any initial state of the two-spin system belonging to such a subspace evolves as if the coupling between the two spins and the bath were absent [46][47][48]. The physical reason at the basis of this occurrence relies on the equal coupling of the two spins to the bath, i.e., c 1j = c 2j , ∀j.…”
Section: Exactly Solvable Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, we look for a decoherence-free subspace [36,37]. In order to be insensitive to the noise, a quantum state should belong to the kernel of the dissipator (which implies it does not have a direct coupling to the environment) and to the kernel of the qubit-oscillator coupling (in order to avoid indirect coupling to the environment), thus obtaining a state that is interactionfree [38,39] with respect to the qubit-resonator coupling. By imposing the second condition,…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, we will look for a decoherence-free subspace [37,38]. In order to be insensitive to the noise, a quantum state should belong to the kernel of the dissipator (which implies it not to have a direct coupling to the environment) and to the kernel of the qubit-oscillator coupling (in order to avoid indirect coupling to the environment), thus obtaining a state which is interactionfree [39,40] with respect to the qubit-resonator coupling. By imposing the second condition,…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%