2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Millman's formula and its application for estimation problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DF method, however, assimilates each data set resulting from a single experiment separately using a "local" EnKF to obtain a local estimate of parameters. The multiple local estimates are then "fused" using the generalized Millman formula (GMF) algorithm (Bar-Shalom and Campo, 1986;Shin et al, 2006), which constitutes an unbiased linear estimator of multiple correlated or uncorrelated estimates. The two inversion schemes are implemented to assimilate the responses resulting from five pumping tests.…”
Section: A H Alzraiee Et Al: Hydraulic Tomography Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DF method, however, assimilates each data set resulting from a single experiment separately using a "local" EnKF to obtain a local estimate of parameters. The multiple local estimates are then "fused" using the generalized Millman formula (GMF) algorithm (Bar-Shalom and Campo, 1986;Shin et al, 2006), which constitutes an unbiased linear estimator of multiple correlated or uncorrelated estimates. The two inversion schemes are implemented to assimilate the responses resulting from five pumping tests.…”
Section: A H Alzraiee Et Al: Hydraulic Tomography Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14) constitutes in essence a weighted average of the "local" estimates of the Y and Z fields, with weights (Eq. 21) that are inversely related to the corresponding "local" covariances (Shin et al, 2006), it produces fused estimates with a coefficient r that cannot be larger than those associated with the best "local" estimate and, consequently, those obtained with the "global" CF estimate. However, the DF scheme has an operational advantage over the CF scheme, in that the "raw" transient data are not required to apply fusion.…”
Section: Decentralized Fusion Of Ht Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) The covariance in (14) represents the nondiagonal element of the block covariance matrix , which is expressed as follows: (15) at , which is described by the Lyapunov recursive equation.…”
Section: Decentralized Moving Average Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important practical problem in the above systems and architectures is to find a fusion estimate to combine the information from various local estimates to produce a global (fusion) estimate. Optimal mean square linear fusion formulas, for an arbitrary number of local estimates with matrix and scalar weights, have been reported in [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in spite of its limitations, the decentralized estimation has been widely used and is superior to the centralized estimation in real applications. The aforementioned papers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have not focused on the prediction problem, but most of them have considered only decentralized filtering of state variables in multisensory dynamic models. The decentralized prediction of the state requires special algorithms presented in [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%