2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00945g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized nano-thermodynamic model for capturing size-dependent surface segregation in multi-metal alloy nanoparticles

Abstract: Nano-thermodynamic model captures thermodynamic preference of metal species for different regions of a nanoparticle while accounting for size effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37] In these systems, Group 11 metals segregate to the surface after annealing, while Group 10 metals migrate to the subsurface, forming core@shell nanostructures. 22 The thermodynamics of such segregation phenomenon has been studied extensively in the computational literature as a function of size mismatch, miscibility, composition, cluster size, cluster shape, and temperature, especially for Pd-doped Group 11 systems: Pd@Cu; 19,31,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Pd@Ag; Pd@Au. 45,62,68,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] Thermodynamically, surface segregation can be understood within the framework of the quasi-chemical approximation, 86 where surface and subsurface species are modeled to be in a state of chemical equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37] In these systems, Group 11 metals segregate to the surface after annealing, while Group 10 metals migrate to the subsurface, forming core@shell nanostructures. 22 The thermodynamics of such segregation phenomenon has been studied extensively in the computational literature as a function of size mismatch, miscibility, composition, cluster size, cluster shape, and temperature, especially for Pd-doped Group 11 systems: Pd@Cu; 19,31,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Pd@Ag; Pd@Au. 45,62,68,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] Thermodynamically, surface segregation can be understood within the framework of the quasi-chemical approximation, 86 where surface and subsurface species are modeled to be in a state of chemical equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although interfaces between metal nanoparticles and the metal oxide support have been extensively investigated, less is known about interfaces that form on alloys themselves, independent of the support. Phase segregation on metallic alloy nanoparticles can form metal/metal interfaces primarily arising from differences in surface free energy of the metal components and unfavorable mixing enthalpies [7][8][9] . Under oxidizing conditions, complex metal/oxide and oxide/oxide interfaces can form by phase separation and surface segregation arising from differences in metal-oxygen bonding 10,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,51 Systems such as Cu−Ag, Au−Ni, and Au−Pt have positive heats of mixing that favor phasesegregation whereas systems such as Pt−Pd, Ag−Au, and Ni− Pd have negative heats of mixing that enable alloying. 18 Galvanic replacement could also be used in tandem with other postsynthetic steps when synthesizing more complex geometries or multicomponent nanostructures. The insights presented in this work could be used to achieve a higher level of synthetic control in a wide selection of binary NCs for applications in energy storage, catalysis, nanomedicine, and photonics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%