2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-008-9752-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Nearest-Neighbor Broken-Bond Analysis of Randomly Oriented Coherent Interfaces in Multicomponent Fcc and Bcc Structures

Abstract: In this article, a model for the estimation of matrix/precipitate interfacial energies is developed. The classic nearest-neighbor broken-bond (NNBB) model is taken as a basis and further developed, to (1) take into account atomic bindings over an arbitrary number of neighboring shells and (2) account for general, multicomponent solid solutions. The model is sufficiently simple and yet reliable for providing estimates of interfacial energies in applications in complex, time-consuming computer simulations of a m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) l ki is the chemical potential of component i in precipitate k, c ki is the mean concentration of element i in precipitate k, q k is the radius of precipitate k, and c k is the interfacial energy of the precipitate-matrix interface. These interfacial energies are obtained from a nearest neighbour broken bond model [54]. The Gibbs free energies are calculated using the standard CALPHAD method and the associated thermodynamic database [55].…”
Section: Precipitation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) l ki is the chemical potential of component i in precipitate k, c ki is the mean concentration of element i in precipitate k, q k is the radius of precipitate k, and c k is the interfacial energy of the precipitate-matrix interface. These interfacial energies are obtained from a nearest neighbour broken bond model [54]. The Gibbs free energies are calculated using the standard CALPHAD method and the associated thermodynamic database [55].…”
Section: Precipitation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But σ can also be mathematically achieved by considering it as a function of a chemical component in the alloy system [52]. In its basic form, the interfacial energy is directly proportional to the enthalpy of the alloy, which can be expressed as [65],…”
Section: Interfacial Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found by Sonderegger et al. that z*/z = 0.329 in fcc and bcc structures based on the nearest-neighbour broken-bond analysis [65]. N* is the number of cross bonds per atom at the interface and can be determined using the relation of * = 4 2/3 / 2 (11) where is the effective lattice constant, taken as = ( + )/2.…”
Section: Interfacial Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobility data used in the simulations are compiled from the assessments of Jönsson 15) and Liu et al 16) The generalized broken-bond model 17) is used for calculation of the interfacial energy γ0 between matrix and precipitates. A radius-dependent size-correction is used for the small, coherent B2 precipitates.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Precipitates With Variable Nucleus Cmentioning
confidence: 99%