2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Numerical Solution for Detention Basin Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, this curve was usually approximated by using some empirical equations. For example, Akan and Antoun () and Graber () used a similar form of the storage–stage equation to model detention basins: s=bhcwhere s is the storage of the detention basin, b and c are coefficients that are determined by the geometry and h is the stage. The values of b and c are considered to be constant values, although they may vary for different detention basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, this curve was usually approximated by using some empirical equations. For example, Akan and Antoun () and Graber () used a similar form of the storage–stage equation to model detention basins: s=bhcwhere s is the storage of the detention basin, b and c are coefficients that are determined by the geometry and h is the stage. The values of b and c are considered to be constant values, although they may vary for different detention basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inflow (Qi) and Outflow (Qo) hydrographs in a reservoir. detention basins, obtained through generalized numerical solution, are presented by Graber (2009) andFroehlich (2009). In all cases, simplifying assumptions are made for the storms and river basins.…”
Section: The Flood Damping Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… triangular (Abt and Grig 1978, Basha 1995, Gomez et al 2001, Hong 2008,  trapezoidal (Burton 1980, Aron and Kibler 1990, Guo 1999, Hong et al 2006, Graber 2009, Froehlich 2009),  defi ned by gamma probability density function (Kessler and Diskin 1991, McEnroe 1992, Akan and Houghtalen 2003,  curvilinear (Q = f(t) in the SCS method (Akan 1990) Banasik et al 2014) confi rms that the hydrograph of outfl ow from a small catchment, i.e. with the surface of up to 200 ha, caused by a short-term intensive rainfall can be defi ned using a triangle, a power function or the gamma distribution.…”
Section: Infl Ow Hydrographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing methods of sizing reservoirs relatively rarely take into account the hydrograph shape (Hager and Sinninger 1985, Akan and Houghtalen 2003, Hong 2009, Graber 2009), and in many methods it is disregarded (Baker 1979, SCS 1986. Moreover, numerous simplifying assumptions in various methods lead to a considerable difference in the obtained results (Szeląg and Kiczko 2014), which in practice hinders the selection of a method appropriate for calculating the required reservoir volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%