2006
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.73.042703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized oscillator strengths for the valence-shell excitations of argon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

24
43
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
24
43
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the high-energy EELS is a powerful tool to investigate the structure of atoms or molecules for the dipole-forbidden transition, but the contributions from the second-order Born term significantly influence the dynamic behavior of the dipole-allowed transition. In addition, the present work clarifies the difference between the GOSs measured by high-energy electron impact experiments and the theoretical calculations [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the high-energy EELS is a powerful tool to investigate the structure of atoms or molecules for the dipole-forbidden transition, but the contributions from the second-order Born term significantly influence the dynamic behavior of the dipole-allowed transition. In addition, the present work clarifies the difference between the GOSs measured by high-energy electron impact experiments and the theoretical calculations [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, for other atoms, the disagreements between the experimental results and theoretical calculations in the larger momentum transfer region were generally observed [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These disagreements are strange because the experimental data measured by different groups [10,15] with different methods are in good agreement, while the electronic correlation is considered carefully in the calculation of random phase approximation with exchange (RPAE) [12][13][14]16,17]. Such discrepancy puzzled experimentalists and theorists for several years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, one can enhance the contribution of the nondipole parameters, since the condition ω/c q R −1 is easy to achieve. Let us note that even while neglecting the terms with q, (12) and (13) remain different: in photoionization, the angular distribution is proportional to sin 2 θ [see Eq. (12)], whereas in the inelastic scattering it is proportional to cos 2 θ [see Eq.…”
Section: Main Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12)], whereas in the inelastic scattering it is proportional to cos 2 θ [see Eq. (13)]. The reason for this difference is clear.…”
Section: Main Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation