2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipl.2008.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized rate monotonic schedulability bounds using relative period ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proof of Theorem 3 in [7], the authors implicitly assume that if a task set is not schedulable, then the task with the longest period, which has the lowest priority, would miss its deadline. It is not always correct, especially when the maximum period ratio is very large.…”
Section: Theorem 3 Of [7] Let Z I Be the Ratio Of The Ith Smallest Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the proof of Theorem 3 in [7], the authors implicitly assume that if a task set is not schedulable, then the task with the longest period, which has the lowest priority, would miss its deadline. It is not always correct, especially when the maximum period ratio is very large.…”
Section: Theorem 3 Of [7] Let Z I Be the Ratio Of The Ith Smallest Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) can be applied by applying the concept of virtual period for task sets with period ratio greater than or equal to 2 (that is, T n 2T 1 ). However, the claim made in [7] is not exactly correct. In this Letter, a counter-example is presented showing the above claim is not applicable to all task sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations