1994
DOI: 10.1007/s00041-001-4004-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Rudin-Shapiro Systems

Abstract: The classical Rudin-Shapiro construction produces a sequence of polynomials with ±1 coefficients such that on the unit circle each such polynomial P satisfies the "flatness" property P ∞ ≤ √ 2 P 2 . It is shown how to construct blocks of such flat polynomials so that the polynomials in each block form an orthogonal system. The construction depends on a fundamental generating matrix and a recursion rule. When the generating matrix is a multiple of a unitary matrix, the flatness, orthogonality, and other symmetr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An elegant construction achieving all combinations of sign changes is found in Benke [4] (Byrnes [8,10] gives a similar construction). In short,…”
Section: The Rudin-shapiro Transformmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An elegant construction achieving all combinations of sign changes is found in Benke [4] (Byrnes [8,10] gives a similar construction). In short,…”
Section: The Rudin-shapiro Transformmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Consequently, the matrices are called the Rudin-Shapiro transform (RST). It is shown in Benke [4] that this construction can be generalized in various ways. The individual entries in the Rudin-Shapiro transform can be found by the following equation, where…”
Section: The Rudin-shapiro Transformmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One interesting characteristic of a GRS sequence is that a uniform upper bound for the PAPR, which is independent of the length sequence [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], is considered as a flat polynomial having the properties of a spread spectrum sequence [16]. Additionally this polynomial is orthogonal and its amplitude is on the unit circle [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: B Short Preamblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, arbitrarily interchanges of the signs in each recursive step does not affect the properties of the constructed sequences. An elegant construction achieving all combinations of sign changes is found in Benke [6] (Byrnes [7,8] gives a similar construction). In short,…”
Section: The Rudin-shapiro Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2 × 2 matrix in (10) aside, it is not immediately obvious neither how this definition is linked to (6), nor that it defines a symmetric transform. However, a fairly straightforward proof shows that the rows of P ( J ) are the coefficients of the polynomials defined in (6), see la Cour-Harbo [9], and thus that the defined transform does indeed possess the properties derived above for the Rudin-Shapiro transform.…”
Section: Definition 1 Define the Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%