2016
DOI: 10.1515/jiip-2016-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized sensitivity functions for multiple output systems

Abstract: The main purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of generalized sensitivity matrices extending the usual concept of generalized sensitivity functions. We consider systems with finitely many measurable outputs, because this case occurs frequently. It is demonstrated that the generalized sensitivity matrix can be interpreted as the Jacobian of the estimated parameters with respect to the nominal parameter vector. This interpretation is supported by numerical results for two examples, the Verhulst–Pearl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the available data do not support the complexity of the model. A future study may apply a systematic analysis of model sensitivity and parameter correlations, for example using the profile-likelihood method of Raue et al (35) or generalized sensitivity functions of Thomaseth and Cobelli (36) [extended to multiple output models by Kappel and Munir (37)]. Another potential study for future work could involve estimating model parameters from synthetic timecourse data, to see whether more frequent sampling or a longer observation period provides more stable parameter estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the available data do not support the complexity of the model. A future study may apply a systematic analysis of model sensitivity and parameter correlations, for example using the profile-likelihood method of Raue et al (35) or generalized sensitivity functions of Thomaseth and Cobelli (36) [extended to multiple output models by Kappel and Munir (37)]. Another potential study for future work could involve estimating model parameters from synthetic timecourse data, to see whether more frequent sampling or a longer observation period provides more stable parameter estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this chapter, we analyze the proposed model of vascular refilling with inflammation presented in the previous chapter. We apply sensitivity analysis, parameter estimation, and subset selection methods as discussed in the papers [86,87,88,89]. Measurements for at least one output of the system are essential in our analyses.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following sections discuss theories on sensitivity analysis, subset selection, and parameter estimation using [86,87,88,89] as main references. We then apply these methods on the proposed model with hematocrit and fluid flux as model outputs, and with respect to the parameters a, L, d, b and c. Two cases are considered in the estimation of parameters: first, when CRP concentration is slightly elevated and second, when CRP concentration is high.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since novel model is a compartmental model with six outputs G p , G i , Q 1a , Q 1b and Q 2 , we consider a multiple-output system with the measurable outputs [8], [14] modeled by…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%