2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63719-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized sequential state discrimination for multiparty QKD and its optical implementation

Abstract: Sequential state discrimination is a strategy for N separated receivers. As sequential state discrimination can be applied to multiparty quantum key distribution (QKD), it has become one of the relevant research fields in quantum information theory. Up to now, the analysis of sequential state discrimination has been confined to special cases. In this report, we consider a generalization of sequential state discrimination. Here, we do not limit the prior probabilities and the number of quantum states and receiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Representations ( 9) and ( 17) imply that if, for a state instrument M, there exists a statistical realization Ξ where a state σ = |b b| is pure while the values of a projectionvalued measure P have the form P(ω) = |ξ ω ξ ω |, where {|ξ ω , ω ∈ Ω} is an orthonormal basis of H, then, for this state instrument M, there is representation (9) where the Kraus operators are labeled only by an outcome ω ∈ Ω and are defined via the relations (see Lemma 1 in Section 3.2 of Ref. [18]):…”
Section: Statistical Realizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Representations ( 9) and ( 17) imply that if, for a state instrument M, there exists a statistical realization Ξ where a state σ = |b b| is pure while the values of a projectionvalued measure P have the form P(ω) = |ξ ω ξ ω |, where {|ξ ω , ω ∈ Ω} is an orthonormal basis of H, then, for this state instrument M, there is representation (9) where the Kraus operators are labeled only by an outcome ω ∈ Ω and are defined via the relations (see Lemma 1 in Section 3.2 of Ref. [18]):…”
Section: Statistical Realizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Bergou [3] firstly devised the sequential unambiguous state discrimination where a receiver discriminates a sender's quantum state and a further receiver discriminates posterior states from the previous receiver. However, in [3], every receiver performs the so called sequential unambiguous state discrimination where each receiver's conclusive result is always confident, even though this receiver can obtain the inconclusive result with a non-zero probability, and until now there have been numerous theoretical and experimental developments [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] on only this type of sequential state discrimination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MED, a general solution exists for two quantum states [ 3 ] but a general solution to more than two quantum states does not exist. Nevertheless, state discrimination is used in wide application of quantum information processing [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond a standard quantum state discrimination between a sender and a receiver, the sequential unambiguous state discrimination scenario between a sender and N receivers was presented [10] in 2013, and experimental schemes for implementation of this scenario of a state discrimination have been theoretically proposed [11,12]. For example, when a sender prepares one of two polarized single photon states, then N receivers can build their quantum measurements by using the Sagnac-like interferometers [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%