2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp06592j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized single excitation configuration interaction: an investigation into the impact of the inclusion of non-orthogonality on the calculation of core-excited states

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate different non-orthogonal generalizations of the configuration interaction with single substitutions (CIS) method and their impact on the calculation of core-excited states.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive review of X-ray absorption simulation techniques has been published recently by Norman and Dreuw. [6] Briefly, one possible choice is to use wave function based methods like coupled-cluster (CC), [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] symmetry adapted clusterconfiguration interaction (SAC-CI), [15,16] configuration interaction, [17][18][19][20][21][22] or the algebraic-diagramatic construction (ADC) method. [23][24][25][26][27][28] In general, all of these methods are accurate and reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive review of X-ray absorption simulation techniques has been published recently by Norman and Dreuw. [6] Briefly, one possible choice is to use wave function based methods like coupled-cluster (CC), [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] symmetry adapted clusterconfiguration interaction (SAC-CI), [15,16] configuration interaction, [17][18][19][20][21][22] or the algebraic-diagramatic construction (ADC) method. [23][24][25][26][27][28] In general, all of these methods are accurate and reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation would suggest that the model with localized holes states for a system with symmetry equivalent atoms provides the best zeroth-order picture for core ionization in these systems. The approach proposed here for core photoionization calculations is related to the one-center non-orthogonal configuration interaction with single substitutions (1C-NOCIS) method which has been proposed for the study of metastable core-excited states [30]. In the NOCIS method non-orthogonal configurations based on localized orbitals provide a superior reference basis in which to describe electron correlation in an isolated molecule, while here such configurations provide a better reference from which to describe channel coupling in the presence of the photoelectron, which is also an electron correlation effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, a fractional occupancy of 0.5 is used which is suitable for core‐excitations since it provides a balance between initial and final state effects 85 . Another method that goes beyond the STEX approximation through the inclusion of the coupling between non‐orthogonal configurations is non‐orthogonal configuration interaction singles (NOCIS) 86,87 . Prendergast and co‐workers have developed the excited electron and core‐hole approach (XCH) which models the first core‐excited state by representing the core‐excited atom using a modified pseudopotential, and the electron excited from this atom is placed in the first available valence orbital 88‐91 .…”
Section: X‐ray Absorption Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%