2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1789622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized Taylor and Generalized Calvo Price and Wage-Setting: Micro Evidence with Macro Implications

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this paper was to explore what we can learn about the cross‐sectional distribution from the frequency data. The cross‐sectional distribution is also required if we are to calibrate price‐setting on the economy as a Generalized Taylor economy (GT) where we consider the economy as made up of price‐setters who set prices for different durations which are known ex ante (Taylor, , Dixon and Le Bihan, ). What is the cost of losing information by summarizing the distribution of price changes based on the frequency data?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of this paper was to explore what we can learn about the cross‐sectional distribution from the frequency data. The cross‐sectional distribution is also required if we are to calibrate price‐setting on the economy as a Generalized Taylor economy (GT) where we consider the economy as made up of price‐setters who set prices for different durations which are known ex ante (Taylor, , Dixon and Le Bihan, ). What is the cost of losing information by summarizing the distribution of price changes based on the frequency data?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also calibrate the models for quarterly and monthly versions. The pricing models used are the Generalized Taylor (GT) and Generalized Calvo (GC) as in Dixon and Le Bihan (), which are both consistent with any micro distributions of durations and can be calibrated both to the estimated distribution and the hypothetical distributions under both the Bernoulli–Calvo hypothesis and the theoretical minimum duration corresponding to Proposition 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors show that this extended DSGE model generates impulse responses that quantitatively match those found in the actual data. In contrast to Olivei and Tenreyro (2007), where the seasonal heterogeneity is addressed, Dixon and Bihan (2012) investigate the effects of heterogeneity in the rigidity of wages across industries. Using data from France, the authors calibrate two independent variations for nominal rigidities: a so-called Generalized Taylor Economy (GTE), where firms have wage spells of different durations, and a Generalized Calvo Economy (GCE), where firms have different probabilities of resetting their wage (price).…”
Section: Evidence Of Heterogeneity In Price and Wage Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving the Reset Wage in a GT Economy Starting from (16), we first substitute for w à tþk using (15), and then substitute for n(h) tþk using (10) and noting that w(h) tþk ¼ x it for k ¼ 0,. . .,(i À 1): 21 Dixon and Le Bihan (2011).…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dixon and Le Bihan (2011).2012 ] 551G E N E R A L T A Y L O R A N D C A L V O F O R P R I C E S A N D W A G E S Ó 2012The Author(s). The Economic Journal Ó 2012 Royal Economic Society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%