2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalized warping analysis of curved beams by BEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This beam is examined as curved with 25.465 R m and an arc length L of 40 m. The displacement field considered is the one described in eqns. (4).…”
Section: Doubly Symmetric Box-shaped Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This beam is examined as curved with 25.465 R m and an arc length L of 40 m. The displacement field considered is the one described in eqns. (4).…”
Section: Doubly Symmetric Box-shaped Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of such members employing the so-called "Higher-Order Beam Theories" [1][2][3] is of increased interest due to their important advantages over more elaborate approaches based on shell or solid finite elements [4], which are mainly incorporated in commercial software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest research on static analyses of thin-walled beams [1] was by Vlasov in 1960; Dabrowski expanded the thin-walled curved beam theory [2] in 1968. Focusing on different influencing factors, a large number of studies have been made to use the analytical solutions such as solutions considered beam elements [3][4][5][6], the effect of warping distortional analysis [7,8], the higher-order one-dimensional analysis [9][10][11][12], and cross-sectional deformation modes and curvature effect [13,14]. A new two-node finite element is presented for the spatial static analyses considering crosssectional deformation modes and curvature effect; further, the cross section was assumed to be in-extensional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the transverse bending due to the frame-effect of box cross section and to the distortion itself, imply the contribution of web and slab stiffness to the global strength and to the overall mechanical behavior. This implies that the designer has to consider all these effects for the evaluation of reinforcement demand in the transverse direction and the immediate consequence is the growing importance of analysis methods, which take into account the restrained warping stresses of torsion and distortion together with the transverse forces due to the in-plane deformation (Murı´n et al, 2014;Park et al, 2005;Sapountzakis et al, 2015). The presence of such efforts leads to a strong interaction, especially in the box webs, where the reinforcements are to be considered at the same time as ''stirrups'' of the beam engaged by shear and torsion (tangential stress) and as longitudinal bars of the web, due to transverse bending (axial stresses in the transverse direction).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%