2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00886-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizing the predictive relationship between 1-month motor skill retention and Rey–Osterrieth Delayed Recall scores from nondemented older adults to individuals with chronic stroke: a short report

Abstract: Motor learning is fundamental to motor rehabilitation outcomes. There is growing evidence from non-neurological populations supporting the role of visuospatial memory function in motor learning, but current predictive models of motor recovery of individuals with stroke generally exclude cognitive measures, thereby overlooking the potential link between motor learning and visuospatial memory. Recent work has demonstrated that a clinical test of visuospatial memory (Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Delayed Recall) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…may predict motor therapy outcomes [ 72 ], a visuospatial test is quick and easy to administer during the duration of a typical clinical visit, making it a more feasible alternative in terms of predicting motor rehabilitation responsiveness. Second, we have previously observed the behavioral relationship between cognitive testing and upper-extremity skill retention across patient populations [ 11 , 73 ], suggesting this relationship is not disease-specific and is broadly generalizable across geriatric populations. Given the prevalence of cognitive impairment even in community-dwelling older adults [ 3 , 74 , 75 ], it is plausible that older adults seeking physical therapy for a variety of reasons could have subtle underlying visuospatial impairments that may impede their responsiveness to therapy, regardless of the etiology (i.e., white matter hyperintensities [ 76 ], stroke, etc.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…may predict motor therapy outcomes [ 72 ], a visuospatial test is quick and easy to administer during the duration of a typical clinical visit, making it a more feasible alternative in terms of predicting motor rehabilitation responsiveness. Second, we have previously observed the behavioral relationship between cognitive testing and upper-extremity skill retention across patient populations [ 11 , 73 ], suggesting this relationship is not disease-specific and is broadly generalizable across geriatric populations. Given the prevalence of cognitive impairment even in community-dwelling older adults [ 3 , 74 , 75 ], it is plausible that older adults seeking physical therapy for a variety of reasons could have subtle underlying visuospatial impairments that may impede their responsiveness to therapy, regardless of the etiology (i.e., white matter hyperintensities [ 76 ], stroke, etc.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the dimensionality of our statistical model and address collinearity among model predictors (i.e., mitigate the effect of reduced statistical significance due to collinearity between skill retention and visuospatial test scores), principal component analysis (PC) was used to create a ‘composite score’ that represented the shared variance of skill retention and Delayed Recall score for each participant. Since our previous work has shown a relationship between these two variables [ 11 , 28 ], the PC analysis allowed for consideration of only the shared variance between them as an independent variable. Only PCs with an eigenvalue greater than one were carried forward in subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, a more comprehensive battery of cognitive assessments would determine whether specific cognitive domains (or specific cognitive deficits) more closely predict motor skill retention in this population. For example, visuospatial deficits may interfere with upper-extremity learning ( 23 25 , 52 , 53 ), while fluid cognitive skills or executive function may interfere with lower-extremity learning ( 54 ). While these previous studies have not focused on motor learning in PD specifically, the effects of particular cognitive deficits may not be PD-specific but instead generalize to a number of older patient populations who may be receiving motor rehabilitation for a number of reasons (e.g., stroke, joint replacement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%