75he roles of classical realism, logical positivism, and pragmatic" instrumentatism in the shaping of fundamental ideas in quantum physics are examined in the light of some recent historical and sociological studies of the factors that influenced their development. It is shown that those studies indicate that the conventionalistic form of instrumentalism that has dominated all the major post-World War H developments in quantum physics is not an outgrowth of the Copenhagen school, and that despite the "schism" in twentieth century physics created by the Bohr-Einstein "disagreements" on foundational issues in quantum theory, both their philosophical stands were very much opposed to those of conventionalistic instrumentalism. Quotations .from the writings of Dirac, Heisenberg, Popper, Russell, and other influential thinkers, are provided, illustrating the fact that, despite the various divergencies in their opinions, they all either opposed the instrumentalist concept of "truth'" in general, or its conventionalistic version in post-World War H quantum physics in particular. The basic epistemic ideas of a quantum geometry approach to quantum physies ate reviewed and discussed from the point of view of a quantum realism that seeks to reconcile Bohr's "positivism" with Einstein's "reatism" by emphasizing the existence of an underlying quantum reality, in which the), both believed. This quantum geometry framework seeks to introduce geometro-stochastic concepts that are specifically designed for the systematic description of that underlying quantum reality, by devetop#~g the conceptual and mathematical tools that are most appropriate for such a use.