2019
DOI: 10.1093/comnet/cnz011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating connected random graphs

Abstract: Sampling random graphs is essential in many applications, and often algorithms use Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to sample uniformly from the space of graphs. However, often there is a need to sample graphs with some property that we are unable, or it is too inefficient, to sample using standard approaches. In this paper we are interested in sampling graphs from a conditional ensemble of the underlying graph model. We present an algorithm to generate samples from an ensemble of connected random graphs using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, one observes some interesting differences in comparison to the HMF results. To some extent these differences are due, in the scale-free case, to the real random occurrence of large hubs in the network, while in the HMF approximation all hubs contribute "virtually" to dynamics, each one with a small probability [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Numerical Solutions Of the Bass Diffusion Equation On Assort...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, one observes some interesting differences in comparison to the HMF results. To some extent these differences are due, in the scale-free case, to the real random occurrence of large hubs in the network, while in the HMF approximation all hubs contribute "virtually" to dynamics, each one with a small probability [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Numerical Solutions Of the Bass Diffusion Equation On Assort...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more subtle sampling technique, for example applying the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, could extend the results of this work substantially. [12] Table 5. For each n from 20 to 87, the probability that a graph chosen uniformly at random from the set of graphs with n vertices is universally solvable, approximated by 1,000,000 trials; all graphs chosen were incidentally connected.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common proposal used when implementing MCMC on networks is to change a random node pair (i.e. creating a new edge or removing old edges) [7,19]. However, in sparse graphs non-edges are proposed much more often than edges, and the sampler wastes time proposing new edges that are likely to be rejected.…”
Section: Bayesian Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%