2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2522884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Domain-Specific Dictionaries Using Bayesian Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, practitioners might prefer alternatives that further extend linguistic terms t with a metric w t discriminating the relative importance (e. g. "risk" may be a stronger indicator of risk than "may"). The benefit of our approach is that it can be easily replaced by such a scoring mechanism, i. e. changing R d to t w t tf t /#total words and O d analogously [51]. For reasons of reproducibility and ease-of-use, we demonstrate the outcomes for a simple categorization without weighting in the following.…”
Section: Language Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, practitioners might prefer alternatives that further extend linguistic terms t with a metric w t discriminating the relative importance (e. g. "risk" may be a stronger indicator of risk than "may"). The benefit of our approach is that it can be easily replaced by such a scoring mechanism, i. e. changing R d to t w t tf t /#total words and O d analogously [51]. For reasons of reproducibility and ease-of-use, we demonstrate the outcomes for a simple categorization without weighting in the following.…”
Section: Language Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Varazzo, 2011). Text processing is done using the Natural Language Toolkit (Bird et al, 2009) and the package sentimentAnalysis (Pröllochs et al, 2015) for the statistical programming language R (R Core Team, 2016). All machine learning models are implemented using scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al, 2011).…”
Section: Data Preparation and Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A viable trade-off is commonly presented by drawing upon sentiment dictionaries as a form of feature engineering. Here the idea is to incorporate domain knowledge in the form of predefined dictionaries that label terms into different semantic categories [44]. The conventional assumption is that the overall sentiment hints the economic outlook [45,46,7].…”
Section: Sentiment-based Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%