2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/7360953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Human-Like Velocity-Adapted Jumping Gait from sEMG Signals for Bionic Leg’s Control

Abstract: In the case of dynamic motion such as jumping, an important fact in sEMG (surface Electromyogram) signal based control on exoskeletons, myoelectric prostheses, and rehabilitation gait is that multichannel sEMG signals contain mass data and vary greatly with time, which makes it difficult to generate compliant gait. Inspired by the fact that muscle synergies leading to dimensionality reduction may simplify motor control and learning, this paper proposes a new approach to generate flexible gait based on muscle s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… •sEMG: Signals are detected with sensors placed on the muscle surface, usually with two or more electrodes since it measures the electrical difference between activated muscle and a reference point ( Cabral et al., 2018 ). Several studies ( Luu et al., 2017 ; Yu et al., 2017 ; Su et al., 2019 ; Peng et al., 2020b ) use the described method of interaction due to its almost instant response, non-invasive technology, and ease of use. However, the disadvantage of this method is the noise produced by close muscles ( Nieveen et al., 2020 ), so it requires an analysis of the residual limb activation when performing different activities ( Gupta and Agarwal, 2019 ; Su et al., 2019 ; Wang et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Prosthetic Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… •sEMG: Signals are detected with sensors placed on the muscle surface, usually with two or more electrodes since it measures the electrical difference between activated muscle and a reference point ( Cabral et al., 2018 ). Several studies ( Luu et al., 2017 ; Yu et al., 2017 ; Su et al., 2019 ; Peng et al., 2020b ) use the described method of interaction due to its almost instant response, non-invasive technology, and ease of use. However, the disadvantage of this method is the noise produced by close muscles ( Nieveen et al., 2020 ), so it requires an analysis of the residual limb activation when performing different activities ( Gupta and Agarwal, 2019 ; Su et al., 2019 ; Wang et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Prosthetic Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains much information about muscle activity and has the advantages of noninvasive recording [1]. In recent years, it has become a research hotspot in humanmachine integrated intelligent equipment [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%