2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.srs.2021.100032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating the 30-m land surface temperature product over continental China and USA from landsat 5/7/8 data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose the image which was taken on 9 October 2020 at 02:01:30 (Greenwich Mean Time), and the detailed information is shown in Table 1. To ensure the accuracy of the result of land surface temperature retrieving, we use the retrieving algorithm proposed by Cheng et al [32]. This algorithm can calculate 30 m land surface temperature, which has better accuracy than USGS land surface temperature product [32].…”
Section: Landsat Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We choose the image which was taken on 9 October 2020 at 02:01:30 (Greenwich Mean Time), and the detailed information is shown in Table 1. To ensure the accuracy of the result of land surface temperature retrieving, we use the retrieving algorithm proposed by Cheng et al [32]. This algorithm can calculate 30 m land surface temperature, which has better accuracy than USGS land surface temperature product [32].…”
Section: Landsat Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the accuracy of the result of land surface temperature retrieving, we use the retrieving algorithm proposed by Cheng et al [32]. This algorithm can calculate 30 m land surface temperature, which has better accuracy than USGS land surface temperature product [32]. After atmosphere correction, the algorithm can be divided into two steps.…”
Section: Landsat Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the differences of LST from different sensors are not only affected by atmospheric conditions, performance and posture of sensors and observation angel [17], which are same as surface reflectance data, but also the transit time of different sensors and the inversion accuracy of LST. For example, the LST image retrieved from MODIS image via a generalized split-window algorithm which errors can reach to 1K under ideal conditions [67], [68], [69], [70], and the retrieved LST data from Landsat image is based on single channel algorithm which the errors will be about 1.5K under strict condition control [71], [72], and a recent research finds the retrieved errors from Landsat 5/7/8 LST products can reach 2-3K [73]. Furthermore, the time difference between the LST retrieved from different satellite images is about 30 minutes.…”
Section: B Cfsdafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the predicted increments of fine resolution LST by equation ( 6)-( 7) can be regarded as the optimal results, they are not equal to real increments [73]. It has some residuals between predicted increments and real increments, and the residuals can be expressed as:…”
Section: ) (4) Get the Spatial Increments By Idw Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%