1994
DOI: 10.1139/b94-014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation and utilization of chemical-resistant mutants in Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, the causal agent of tan spot of wheat

Abstract: Tan spot, caused by the fungal pathogen Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, is a major leaf spot disease of wheat worldwide. To facilitate genetic analysis of this homothallic fungus, mutants resistant to the fungicide iprodione or hygromycin B were created through ultraviolet light mutagenesis and used in sexual crosses. Conidia from two isolates of P. tritici-repentis, sensitive to both chemicals (iprodione-S hygromycin-S), were exposed to ultraviolet light to obtain four mutants resistant to iprodione but sensiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Ptr is a homothallic fungus, outcrossing (heterothallic capability) of differentially marked antibiotic-resistant isolates in the laboratory has been shown to occur at low frequency (L. Ciuffetti and J. Gaventa, unpublished data; McCallum et al 1994); however, the extent of outcrossing that occurs in nature remains unknown. In the absence of outcrossing, nuclear transfer could take place through hyphal fusion (data not shown) or conidial anastomosis (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Ptr is a homothallic fungus, outcrossing (heterothallic capability) of differentially marked antibiotic-resistant isolates in the laboratory has been shown to occur at low frequency (L. Ciuffetti and J. Gaventa, unpublished data; McCallum et al 1994); however, the extent of outcrossing that occurs in nature remains unknown. In the absence of outcrossing, nuclear transfer could take place through hyphal fusion (data not shown) or conidial anastomosis (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%