2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of acoustic phase-resolved partial discharge patterns by utilizing UHF signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we focus on reducing noise individually in each detected signal by wavelet filtering and narrowing the noise bandwidth. Although in this work we have not used classification techniques to cluster noise and phantom signals, this post-processing can be applied, either as a phase-resolved partial discharge (PRPD) acoustic pattern [31,32] or with other approaches to signal and noise classification [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we focus on reducing noise individually in each detected signal by wavelet filtering and narrowing the noise bandwidth. Although in this work we have not used classification techniques to cluster noise and phantom signals, this post-processing can be applied, either as a phase-resolved partial discharge (PRPD) acoustic pattern [31,32] or with other approaches to signal and noise classification [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional PD detection methods utilize electronic measurements, including the electromagnetic coupling method [7,8], the capacitive coupling method [9,10], and the ultra-high frequency method [11,12]. Due to the high-voltage environment of power equipment, electromagnetic radiation and interference significantly impact these methods, resulting in poor measurement accuracy and a high probability of omission and misjudgment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of the DP is possible by several methods, among which we can cite: electrical detection, ultra-high frequency detection, acoustic detection, chemical detection, and optical detection. Of these methods, the acoustic method has many advantages due to its immunity to electromagnetic signals, its better signal-to-noise ratio, and its ease of implementation, in addition to these, it makes it possible to simultaneously determine the magnitude, type, and location of PD source [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] ]. The acoustic detection is based on the measurement of the acoustic pressure at the level of the tank, thanks to the use of acoustic sensors placed on the tank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%