2011
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of an atlas of the proximal femur and its application to trabecular bone analysis

Abstract: Automatic placement of anatomically corresponding volumes of interest and comparison of parameters against a standard of reference are essential components in studies of trabecular bone. Only recently, in vivo MR images of the proximal femur, an important fracture site, could be acquired with high-spatial resolution. The purpose of this MRI trabecular bone study was two-fold: (1) to generate an atlas of the proximal femur to automatically place anatomically corresponding volumes of interest in a population stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, novel coil correction methods (24) and image analysis approaches (25)(26)(27)(28) complement the in-vivo assessment of structural bone integrity in the proximal femur. Lastly, the development of advanced image registration techniques allow the comparison of structural bone parameters across a set of MR images at corresponding anatomic locations, e.g., the femoral head, greater trochanter, femoral neck, as well as the total femur (29,30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, novel coil correction methods (24) and image analysis approaches (25)(26)(27)(28) complement the in-vivo assessment of structural bone integrity in the proximal femur. Lastly, the development of advanced image registration techniques allow the comparison of structural bone parameters across a set of MR images at corresponding anatomic locations, e.g., the femoral head, greater trochanter, femoral neck, as well as the total femur (29,30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational anatomy techniques—borrowed from the neuroimaging community—enable local multiparametric assessments of the spatial distribution of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and structural features of the proximal femur from quantitative computed tomography (QCT) images at the population level. Techniques such as voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) for the spatial assessment of vBMD and surface‐based statistical parametric mapping (SPM) for the spatial assessment of cortical bone properties, including cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th) and cortical vBMD (Ct.vBMD), have been validated and successfully applied in previous studies . These advanced image analysis techniques generate cohort‐based spatial parametric atlases by registering individual subject images to a common coordinate system, thus enabling point‐by‐point statistical tests at corresponding anatomic locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as voxel-based morphometry (VBM) for the spatial assessment of vBMD and surface-based statistical parametric mapping (SPM) for the spatial assessment of cortical bone properties, including cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th) and cortical vBMD (Ct.vBMD), have been validated and successfully applied in previous studies. (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) These advanced image analysis techniques generate cohort-based spatial parametric atlases by registering individual subject images to a common coordinate system, thus enabling point-by-point statistical tests at corresponding anatomic locations. These statistical atlases provide an opportunity to visualize a physical parameter of interest, such as vBMD or Ct.Th, in relation to a variable of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably due to small differences in patient positioning. In the future, atlas-based segmentation/registration could improve the reproducibility further [15]; this strategy has been successfully used in the neuroimaging community over the last 15 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%