2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(01)00057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of collision-free 5-axis tool paths using a haptic surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morishige et al (1997) avoided collision by producing the direction of collision avoidance, based on the 2D configuration space (C-space) defined by two parameters which determine the tool attitude. Balasubramaniam et al (2002; generated and verified globally collision-free five-axis finishing toolpaths while also considering machine limits, tool tilt, cusp height limits, tool pitch limits, and the need to keep tool paths continuous by discretizing the part and using a haptic surface. Tournier and Duc (2002) developed a constant scallop height planning strategy to avoid tightening of the tool paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morishige et al (1997) avoided collision by producing the direction of collision avoidance, based on the 2D configuration space (C-space) defined by two parameters which determine the tool attitude. Balasubramaniam et al (2002; generated and verified globally collision-free five-axis finishing toolpaths while also considering machine limits, tool tilt, cusp height limits, tool pitch limits, and the need to keep tool paths continuous by discretizing the part and using a haptic surface. Tournier and Duc (2002) developed a constant scallop height planning strategy to avoid tightening of the tool paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods in automatic 5-axis tool path generation require huge computing time for calculating the tool orientation to avoid gouging and global interferences. Recently, haptic systems began to attract people's interests in varied aspects [11], [18][19], [22][23]. However, only very few of them (e.g., [11,18]) apply the haptic system to 5-axis tool path generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, haptic systems began to attract people's interests in varied aspects [11], [18][19], [22][23]. However, only very few of them (e.g., [11,18]) apply the haptic system to 5-axis tool path generation. The MIT-Suzuki haptic system [11] brought us an intuitive man-machine interface for generating collision-free 5-axis tool path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sweep-envelope differential equation method is probably the most elegant method to date that has proven to be suitable for NC verification [7,8]. Some of the works that have addressed NC verification but have not used swept volume methods include Voelker and Hunt [9], Menon and Voelcker [10], Oliver and Goodman [11], Narvekar et al [12], Takata et al [13], Jerard and Drysdale [14,15], Koren and Lin [16], Menon and Robinson [17], Oliver [18], Liang et al [19], Liu et al [20], Lee [21], Lo [22], Chiou et al [23,24], Elber and Cohen [25], Balasubramaniam et al [26,27], Rao and Sarma [28], Jensen et al [29], Bohez [30], Mann and Bedi [31], Yoon et al [32], Bedi et al [33], Gray et al [34,35], Fussell et al [36], Lauwers et al [37], Jun et al [38], Bohez et al [39], and Langeron et al [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%