2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of fission yield covariances to correct discrepancies in the nuclear data libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several possible approaches to generate covariance data being considered based upon; (i) minimisation of physical constraints, (ii) perturbation of the model parameters underlying the yield distributions, (iii) LSQ or maximum likelihood methods using both an underlying model of fission and experimental data, examples can be found in the [6,[11][12][13][14] and the references therein. However, as the cumulative yields can be directly calculated from the independent yields using decay data, it is also possible to determine the covariance terms iteratively from the experimental data in this evaluation [15].…”
Section: Future Developments 41 Uncertainties On Engineering Quantimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible approaches to generate covariance data being considered based upon; (i) minimisation of physical constraints, (ii) perturbation of the model parameters underlying the yield distributions, (iii) LSQ or maximum likelihood methods using both an underlying model of fission and experimental data, examples can be found in the [6,[11][12][13][14] and the references therein. However, as the cumulative yields can be directly calculated from the independent yields using decay data, it is also possible to determine the covariance terms iteratively from the experimental data in this evaluation [15].…”
Section: Future Developments 41 Uncertainties On Engineering Quantimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SANDY can generate such covariances using the generalized least-squares method described in [9], which adjusts the current data to the available knowledge of observables such as the chain fission yields [10]. Figure 6 shows that the impact of independent fission yield covariances on the decay heat uncertainty reduces by far the importance of such data.…”
Section: Decay Heat Uncertainty Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty propagation was carried out with the NUDUNA code [3] for the cross section data and with the SANDY code [4] for fission yields, decay constants and energies. Both codes base the uncertainty propagation on the random sampling of the input nuclear data according to their uncertainty/covariance information.…”
Section: Decay Heat Uncertainty Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), is one of the major contributor to the uncertainty on computed reactor physics quantities (see for example [1]). Furthermore, the uncertainty propagation can not be properly done since the yield variance-covariance matrices are missing from the evaluated data libraries, despite recent efforts to address this issue [2][3][4][5]. Additionally, some discrepancies between the major libraries exist and need to be understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%