2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of longitudinal flux tube waves in theoretical main-sequence stars: effects of model parameters

Abstract: Aims. We compute the wave energy fluxes carried by longitudinal tube waves along vertically oriented thin magnetic fluxes tubes embedded in the atmospheres of theoretical main-sequence stars based on stellar parameters deduced by Kurucz and Gray. In addition, we present a fitting formula for the wave energy flux based on the governing stellar and magnetic parameters. Methods. A modified theory of turbulence generation based on the mixing-length concept is combined with the magnetohydrodynamic equations to nume… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fits are similar in form to those given by Fawzy & Cuntz (2011) for longitudinal MHD waves. Figure 2 shows a comparison between the above fitting formula and the plotted results of Musielak & Ulmschneider (2002a) for log g = 3, 4, and 5.…”
Section: Setting the Photospheric Propertiessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…These fits are similar in form to those given by Fawzy & Cuntz (2011) for longitudinal MHD waves. Figure 2 shows a comparison between the above fitting formula and the plotted results of Musielak & Ulmschneider (2002a) for log g = 3, 4, and 5.…”
Section: Setting the Photospheric Propertiessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…According to the updated value of α ML , the initial wave energy flux for the acoustic model is given as F M = 1.09 × 10 8 erg cm −2 s −1 (Ulmschneider et al ), see Table . For the wave energy flux of the longitudinal flux tube wave, we use F M = 2.80 × 10 8 erg cm −2 s −1 (Fawzy & Cuntz ); this value assumes a pressure ratio between outside and inside of the tube of ε = 3 (see equation ). It is based on the assumption of an inside magnetic field strength of 1700 G, noting that in our model the equipartition magnetic field strength is given as B eq =8πpe=2082 G with B / B eq ≃ 0.82.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of short-scale magnetoacoustic convective modes, entailing the generation of longitudinal tube waves, has also been explored in detail, as pursued in the framework of time-dependent simulations. By considering photospheric-level magnetic parameters (Fawzy & Cuntz 2011), as well as the detailed treatment of shock formation and dissipation (Fawzy et al 2012), it was found that processes associated with those modes are insufficient to explain the X-ray observations. Another possible mechanism for generating magnetic fields and the resulting X-ray emission in δ Cep (and perhaps other Cepheids) are via a convective zone, or through a combination of convective and pulsation-driven motions and turbulence, within the stellar interior (Narain & Ulmschneider 1996, and subsequent work).…”
Section: The Origins Of the Fuv And X-ray Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%