2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-013-0532-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of new points for training set and feature-level fusion in multimodal biometric identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature level fusion creates a composite feature vector by extracting and combining relevant and discriminant features from the original images. Feature level fusion faces challenges such as incompatibility of biometric vectors, dimensionality problems and difficulty of designing a matching algorithm for feature level matching [1]. Matching score level fusion combines the matching scores of each subsystem of the multibiometric system using techniques such as the weighted sum rule, weighted product, linear discriminant, decision tree, and the Bayesian rule.…”
Section: Figure 1 Taxonomy Of Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature level fusion creates a composite feature vector by extracting and combining relevant and discriminant features from the original images. Feature level fusion faces challenges such as incompatibility of biometric vectors, dimensionality problems and difficulty of designing a matching algorithm for feature level matching [1]. Matching score level fusion combines the matching scores of each subsystem of the multibiometric system using techniques such as the weighted sum rule, weighted product, linear discriminant, decision tree, and the Bayesian rule.…”
Section: Figure 1 Taxonomy Of Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared the recognition accuracy against match score level fusion. In recent research [34], face and iris were fused at the feature level using a new method based on minimum spanning tree. The comparison of their proposed method with traditional feature extractions like PCA, 2DPCA, and KPCA was an indicator of a better recognition result.…”
Section: Feature Level Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%