The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. and therefore related to stress drop. Except in a few notable cases, these displacements cannot be 5 easily related to the absolute stress level, the fault strength, or attributed to a particular physical 6 mechanism. In contrast paleo-earthquakes recorded by exhumed pseudotachylite have a known 7 dynamic mechanism whose properties constrain the co-seismic fault strength. Pseudotachylite 8 can be used to directly address a discrepancy between seismologically-measured stress drops, 9 which are typically a few MPa, and much larger dynamic stress drops expected from thermal 10 weakening during slip at seismic speeds in crystalline rock [Sibson, 1973; McKenzie and Brune, 11 1969;Lachenbruch, 1980; Mase and Smith, 1986;Rice, 2006], and as have been observed in 12 laboratory experiments at high slip rates [Di Toro et al., 2006a]. This note places 13 pseudotachylite-derived estimates of fault strength and inferred crustal stress within the context 14 and bounds of naturally observed earthquake source parameters: apparent stress, stress drop, and 15 overshoot, including consideration of fault surface roughness, off-fault damage, fracture energy, 16 and the 'strength excess'. The analysis, which assumes stress drop is related to corner frequency 17 by the Madariaga [1976] source model, is restricted to earthquakes of the Gole Larghe fault zone 18 in the Italian Alps where the dynamic shear strength is well-constrained by field and laboratory 19 measurements. We find that radiated energy is similar to or exceeds the shear-generated heat and 20 that the maximum strength excess is ~16 MPa. These events have inferred earthquake source 21 parameters that are rare, for instance a few percent of the global earthquake population has stress 22 drops as large, unless: fracture energy is routinely greater than in existing models, 23 pseudotachylite is not representative of the shear strength during the earthquake that generated it, 24 or unless the strength excess is larger than we have allowed. 25 nmb 311/14/16