Background
The COVID-19 related lockdown has profoundly changed human behaviors and habits, impairing general and psychological well-being. Along with psychosocial consequences, it is possible that sexual behavior was also affected.
Aims
With the present study we evaluated the impact of the community-wide containment and consequent social distancing on the intrapsychic, relational, and sexual health through standardized psychometric tools.
Methods
A case-control study was performed through a web-based survey and comparing subjects of both genders with (Group A, N=2608) and without (Group B, N=4213) sexual activity during lockdown. The Welch and chi-square tests were used to assess differences between groups. Univariate analysis of covariance, logistic regression models and structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed to measure influence and mediation effects of sexual activity on psychological, relational, and sexual outcomes.
Outcomes
Main outcome measures were General Anxiety Disorder-7 for anxiety, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression, Dyadic Adjustment Scale for quality of relationship and a set of well-validated sexological inventories (International Index of Erectile Function, Female Sexual Function Index, and male-female versions of the Orgasmometer).
Results
Anxiety and depression scores were significantly lower in subjects sexually active during lockdown. Analysis of covariance identified gender, sexual activity and living without partner during lockdown as significantly affecting anxiety and depression scores (p<0.0001). Logistic regression models showed that lack of sexual activity during lockdown was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing anxiety and depression (OR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.12 - 1.57, p<0.001] and 1.34 [95% CI: 1.15 - 1.57, p<0.0001], respectively). SEM evidenced the protective role of sexual activity towards psychological distress (β
males
=-0.18 and β
females
=-0.14), relational health (β
males
=0.26 and β
females
=0.29) and sexual health, both directly (β
males
=0.43 and β
females
=0.31), and indirectly (β
males
=0.13 and β
females
=0.13).
Clinical translation
The demonstrated mutual influence of sexual health on psychological and relational health could direct the clinical community towards a re-interpretation of the relationship among these factors.
Strengths and limitations
Based on a large number of subjects and well-validated psychometric tools, this study elucidated the protective role of sexual activity for psychological distress, as well for relational and sexual health. Main limitations were the web-based characteristics of the protocol and the retros...