2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00095-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generations in captivity increases behavioral variance: considerations for captive breeding and reintroduction programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, if by chance the male of the original pair had been more wary than the female, this difference could have been passed through the generations and thus explain the patterns observed in this experiment. Additionally, artificial selection over generations in the captive environment could have altered the behavioral repertoire of the subjects, thus influencing their responses to predators (Kleiman et al 1996;McPhee 2003McPhee , 2004aMillar and Threadgill 1987). This could possibly explain why seven of the 24 animals did not respond at all to the owl silhouette.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if by chance the male of the original pair had been more wary than the female, this difference could have been passed through the generations and thus explain the patterns observed in this experiment. Additionally, artificial selection over generations in the captive environment could have altered the behavioral repertoire of the subjects, thus influencing their responses to predators (Kleiman et al 1996;McPhee 2003McPhee , 2004aMillar and Threadgill 1987). This could possibly explain why seven of the 24 animals did not respond at all to the owl silhouette.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Captive-born animals that do not suffer from predatory pressures may lose their ability to recognize their natural predators after a few generations in captivity (Yorzinski 2010). This is because the skills required for predator recognition do not develop, saving energy that is directed to other activities, such as feeding and reproduction (McPhee 2003;Adams et al 2006;Blumstein 2006). The recognition of predators and non-predators by a captive animal can be tested using stuffed models, audio playbacks or predator odors, feces, urine (Griffin et al 2001;2002;Azevedo et al 2012) or by the comparison of the anti-predator behaviors exhibited by captive-born and wild conspecifics (Jackson & Brown 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a relationship between measurements of indices of individual fry behaviour and growth rate, however, is consistent with recent work in Arctic char Salvelinus alpinus (L.) in which no difference in antipredator behaviour was observed between fast and slow-growing groups raised in a standard hatchery conditions (Laakkonen & Hirvonen, 2007). The results of the present study and from work on S. alpinus support the hypothesis that relaxed selection with respect to risk-taking behaviour may allow for high behavioural variability (McPhee, 2004). This is not to say, however, that hatchery conditions do not impose directional selection on other behavioural traits, not measured here, which may affect fitness in captivity and in the wild, post-release environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative hypothesis proposes that selection in the captive environment is relaxed rather than directional. In this vein, McPhee (2004) found that behavioural variance in oldfield mice Peromyscus polionotus increased over generations in captivity, presumably due to a lack of selection pressure against maladaptive behaviour. In support of the notion that the simple environments in common in captive rearing situations may encourage increased behavioural variance, Lee & Berejikian (2008a) observed increased variability in exploratory and feeding behaviours among juvenile steelhead O. mykiss raised in a barren, unstructured environment compared with those raised in environments with either stable structure or structurally variable environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%