2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) for Automatic Reconstruction of the 3D Spine Structure by Using Simulated Bi-Planar X-ray Images

Abstract: In this study, we modified the previously proposed X2CT-GAN to build a 2Dto3D-GAN of the spine. This study also incorporated the radiologist’s perspective in the adjustment of input signals to prove the feasibility of the automatic production of three-dimensional (3D) structures of the spine from simulated bi-planar two-dimensional (2D) X-ray images. Data from 1012 computed tomography (CT) studies of 984 patients were retrospectively collected. We tested this model under different dataset sizes (333, 666, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Best results are marked bold. VerSe-full VerSe-small Dice (+) HD95 (−) NSD (+) Dice (+) HD95 (−) NSD (+) TransVert 1 0.7743 5.4480 0.6718 0.7647 6.6468 0.6094 BX2S-Net 2 0.7558 6.2984 0.6345 0.7494 7.5000 0.5824 Unet 3 0.7712 5.5935 0.6691 0.7582 6.7097 0.6160 SwinUNETR 4 0.7759 5.2873 0.6821 0.7531 6.9923 0.5964 UNETR 5 0.7584 5.9160 0.6546 0.7421 6.7891 0.6012 AttentionUnet 6 0.7696 5.6788 0.6660 0.7535 6.8888 0.6085 OneDConcat 7 0.7822 5.0832 0.6904 0.7637 6.6105 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best results are marked bold. VerSe-full VerSe-small Dice (+) HD95 (−) NSD (+) Dice (+) HD95 (−) NSD (+) TransVert 1 0.7743 5.4480 0.6718 0.7647 6.6468 0.6094 BX2S-Net 2 0.7558 6.2984 0.6345 0.7494 7.5000 0.5824 Unet 3 0.7712 5.5935 0.6691 0.7582 6.7097 0.6160 SwinUNETR 4 0.7759 5.2873 0.6821 0.7531 6.9923 0.5964 UNETR 5 0.7584 5.9160 0.6546 0.7421 6.7891 0.6012 AttentionUnet 6 0.7696 5.6788 0.6660 0.7535 6.8888 0.6085 OneDConcat 7 0.7822 5.0832 0.6904 0.7637 6.6105 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Moon et al achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 69.8% across diverse facial fracture datasets using the YoloX-S object-detection model with CT images, which inherently provide richer information compared to X-rays [ 27 ]. Venturing into the 3D imaging space, Yang et al utilized generative adversarial networks (GANs) to extrapolate 3D spinal structures from 2D X-ray images, leveraging a dataset of 1012 CT images from 984 patients [ 28 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we applied the GAN-based framework for reconstructing 3D spinal vertebrae structures from synthetic biplanar X-ray images as presented by Ying et al (X2CT-GAN), focusing specifically on anterior and lateral views of spinal vertebrae [11]. In contrast to previous work [11,12] which applied X2CT-GAN for 3D reconstruction in medical settings, we focussed on segmented vertebrae to specifically focus on the region of interest (spinal vertebrae) while reducing unnecessary information and thus computational cost. This approach leverages a novel feature fusion technique based on X2CT-GAN to combine information from both views and employs a combination of mean squared error (MSE) loss and adversarial loss to train the generator, resulting in high-quality synthetic 3D spinal vertebrae CTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%